britfrog 180 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 a quick comparison of aerofly fs with switzerland professional in fsx the valley used is that from Sion heading east frame rates in fsx 50-60 aerofly 110-120 so which are fsx and which are aerofly???? Link to post Share on other sites
mutley 4,487 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Obviously the FSX are the first one in each comparison as you left the menu up! Also, the AeroFly has a very strong green cast, now take the same shots in winter Link to post Share on other sites
britfrog 180 Posted July 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 now take the same shots in winter as you requested m8 as you can see Joe in the aerofly pic the cloud was so low it caused a whiteout Link to post Share on other sites
ddavid 149 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Having just spent the last 3 weeks watching the Tour de France, the Aerofly has the edge. As for winter textures, I don't go out on the bike much as the roads are too slippery... Ciao - Vincenzo (formerly known as Dai). Link to post Share on other sites
mutley 4,487 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Like what you did there BF! Link to post Share on other sites
mutley 4,487 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Just to be fair, here are a few images of the area from P3Dv2.2, also featuring OpenLC, Vectors and mesh from Orbx, weather from OPUS. Frames locked at 30 Cheers.. Joe Link to post Share on other sites
ddavid 149 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 How green was my valley, Bach? Still prefer Aerofly for my hols! Cheers - Dai. Link to post Share on other sites
allardjd 1,853 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Still prefer Aerofly for my hols! What if you'd rather go to the seashore? Lake Constance doesn't count. John Link to post Share on other sites
britfrog 180 Posted July 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 That makes an interesting comparison Joe, to be honest I always have my frames locked at 30 as well in fsx, but when i saw what aerofly could do I had to see what fsx could do fps wise. these pics just go to show how individual an fsx installation can be, ones man's meat being another ones fowl, I wonder what this area would look like with gex or similar? to compare with orbx Personally for my usage I have gone away from Orbx , as i have most of europe covered in photoscenery. i will have to now install switzerland pro in my p3d setup to see how it looks it would be interesting to see what others can produce using the same valley from their setup Link to post Share on other sites
britfrog 180 Posted July 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 just tried p3d , I dont seem to be able to set it up well. i am getting only 17fps where with fsx in dx10 i am getting over 50. i changed the shadow sliders to half way and managed to get 24fps also with p3d the mountains are covered in snow in july ??? and it is showing the correct date and season. In fsx it is summer so no snow. so far for me aerofly wins hands down in this situ yes it has huge limitations , but their c172 is masses better than the A2a one for fsx Link to post Share on other sites
mutley 4,487 Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 That's interesting about the quality of their 172. Re the snowcaps, I was at Cairn Gorm near Aviemore about 4 weeks ago and it still had snow on it! Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now