Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As I was getting ready for departure it realised that I couldn't tune my ADF into part frequencies, ie xxx.x., which would be a problem as the frequency for LZ is 284.5. A bit of dead reckoning might be in order here!

Getting ready to go

-2011-apr-23-001.jpg

Shot of the gear going up as requested!

-2011-apr-23-002.jpg

At cruise altitude, very nice day but a little bumpy

-2011-apr-23-003.jpg

-2011-apr-23-004.jpg

Passing LZ, my dead reckoning was a little off and I ended up making a bit of a detour, hopefully a slightly faster cruise speed will help me get nearer to the target time

-2011-apr-23-005.jpg

St Mary's in sight

-2011-apr-23-006.jpg

Preparing for finals, things got a biy busy here with some turbulance and wind shear on finals

-2011-apr-23-007.jpg

Thanks for viewing

Link to post
Share on other sites
That under-cart is awful! But still, great shots!

The gear on Cessna singles (and some of their twins, e.g. 337) is odd looking when cycling. The retraction cycle is a two-stage thing. First the wheels come toward center then go straight back into the wells. It gives a nice wide ground track while still fitting within the confines of the narrow aft fuselage, so functionally works pretty well. There is a point during the retraction cycle when it looks like a stork. Obviously, with a high-wing AC tucking them into the wings isn't an option and it's certainly better than having them hanging out in the breeze. I have the Carenado C-182RG, which Rob is using here and also their C-210 Centurion. Both are great airplanes despite the ungainly gear retraction. It only lasts for a few seconds and if you're inside, you don't have to actually see the sausage being made.

John

Link to post
Share on other sites
But, did you use Runway 18?

Real men use 15/33 !

Nice post Rob :001_th_smiles89:

No, no Joe..

With the current winds real men use runway 27, and stop before it converts to grass :th_smiles73:

Great shots Rob, and I just can't decide what I think of the landing gear on this one.. it looks so darn odd it's almost charming ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When down it doesn't look all that much different than a fixed-gear version with the wheel pants removed (they often are). There is a curve in the struts that the fixed-gear Cessnas don't have but it's only obvious from certain angles. There is that point in the retraction cycle, however, where it looks pretty wierd and Rob has captured it very well in his second shot.

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you say John, it's that special position that does it. I think I've seen it before, and thought the same thing then.

Might even have been in a review here on Mutley's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...