Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Wing struts above the wing have to be big - they're in compression rather than tension and have to be beefy enough to not buckle. Wings struts below the wing are in tension and the load-bearing elemen

But can it lay an egg?   I've seen photos of that one before but don't know what it is or where it's based.  Such poor taste in flying objects is more commonly seen in the hot air balloon ge

What a cock up.

Posted Images

Got it in one, I didn't think the reg would have made a difference to a fictional aircraft. The close ups were filmed using part of an HP Halton. It was a pretty good film for 1951 and the added pull of James Stewart and Marlene Dietrich made it a big success.

No_Highway_in_the_Sky_zps8be354a2.jpg

 

photo_9096_zpsb8141b3f.jpg

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn9gvBYKSkc

 Over to you buddy!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is indeed  the cockpit a TU-114, so it's over to you, Sir. 

 

640px-Aeroflot_Tupolev_Tu-114_JAL_livery

 

You did however get the history wrong. The Tu-95 was the base of the 114, not a derivate. It's creation was a typical case of 'Mine's bigger than your's'. When landing for the Geneva conference in 1954, good ol' Nikita saw that the American president had already arrived in his shiny new Lockheed Constellation, while he sat in a rather modest Illyushin IL-14, He didn't like it. 

So, back in mother Russia, he gave a directive that ordered the Tupolev design bureau to built a passenger plane based on the Tu-95 bomber. The result was the Tu-114 that was presented a year later. 

When visiting the US of A in 1959 Nikita landed at Andrews Airforce Base in his shiny new 114 only to find that the Americans didn't have any airstairs high enough to reach the Tupolev's doors and he had to leave the plane in a somewhat undignified manner, using the emergency escape ladders  :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even more remarkable is the fact that the TU95 had its origins inthe USA! When the Russians reverse engineered the Boeing B29 after capturing a few, they set about improving the design, the first of these was the TU-4, aderitive of this was the TU-80 which kept the fuselage and wing of the TU4 but had a new tail fin and a stepped windscreen arangement. Another spin off from this programme was the TU-70 and TU-75 transport which looked like a single deck Boeing B377 but again with the stepped nose. However they continued to evolve the design and with access to new turboprop engines the thought was given to a new bomber based on the TU-75, that is where the B29 basic design changed dramaticaly, the big Kuznetzov turboprops showed they could handle a lot more performance that a straight winged design, the decision was made to give the aircraft swept wings and in 1956 the giant TU-20  (Design buearue designation TU-95) entered service with the VVS. It was when Kruschev wanted his new transport that the new TU114 transport deritive was born. But it can still tace its ancestry back to the original B-29 Superfortress! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Tu-95 engines are still the largest turbo-props ever to go into series production at around 16,000 shp each - to this day very impressive engines, if not exactly quiet or economical, but they get the job done. A distant second place is the Airbus A400M engines (SNECMA?) at about 11,000 shp per copy.

The Tu-95 became, for all practical purposes, the Soviet Union's B-52.

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...