Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Thought some of you would like to watch this tonight. It should be interesting.

Airplane crash on TV tonight (Thurs) C4 9.00pm. A controlled deliberate crash of a 747 I believe. Pilots bail out and then the A/C is controlled into a crash by remote control.

Cheers

:thum:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good catch, Bri - I'll probably miss it as we don't receive terrestrial TV here in our particular neck of the woods. Still, more than 40,000 passengers have booked the flight:

Crash_TV.jpg

Should be interesting to see how many survive!

When I used to be asked where I wanted to sit, I always said "By the engines, please", figuring that the nuts and bolts at that point in the airframe were probably the strongest! We'll see... :whis:

Cheers - Dai. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a cool show. Lots of logistical problems to take care of to complete their goal. I was surprised to see the 337 being used as a chase plane at first and wasn't surprised to see them replace it for something faster. I now know where I am going to sit next time I do fly. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I used to be asked where I wanted to sit, I always said "By the engines, please", figuring that the nuts and bolts at that point in the airframe were probably the strongest! We'll see... :whis:

Looks like I might have been right:

From The Independent - Scientists, including Anne Evans, a former senior investigator with Britain's Air Accidents Investigation Branch who examined the Lockerbie crash, pored over the wreckage. They concluded that the pilots and front-row passengers would almost certainly have been killed (a warning to first-class ticket-holders, perhaps). Those in the centre would have survived with minor injuries. Passengers at the rear would have been mostly unharmed.

And here's a link to short video from The Telegraph's website:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/mexico/9236653/Passenger-jet-crashed-for-TV-show.html

Personally, I thought she was nose down and would probably survived even with the gear up if the attitude had been positive. Maybe next time...

Cheers - Dai. :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was stated right at the end that every crash is different. One thing to note though was that the engines stayed intact and running even after the crash. There are very few a/c now with that high and rear engine configuration, so it would be likely that different a/c types with under wing engines would suffer more significant engine damage, which would consequently increase the risk of fuel spill and ignition with obvious implications for passengers. I think you're right that a slight flare before impact would have resulted in a different outcome structurally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just watched it on 4OD - very interesting.

I think the fact that every crash is different was slightly overlooked - but what is a typical crash? Most involve fire a la Air France 358, where there was high vertical speed but low horizontal speed, yet everyone got out. Then you have Kegworth, where there was no fire. And British Airtours 28M - the list goes on and on. The engines are a key part - only DC-9s/MD-80's are in regular, commerical services (yes, DC-10's/MD-11's/TriStars are in use, but not in great numbers)

Would have been fun if it was an Airbus post A300/310

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an interesting show, it showed just how tough Boeing aircraft were built, But it was a 40 year old design, surely it would have been more representative to use something newer that is still in widespread use. And notic that inspite of their being several of these controlled crashes done in the past, not one of them has featured a widebody aircraft. Surely there are enough of them to choose from parked out in the desert. :wacko2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think statistically, the rear is the safest place. In many crashes, the tail cone and empennage are torn from the rest of the AC and remain more or less intact. Everything forward seems to act as a "crumple zone" and absorbs some of the energy, causing the deceleration g-forces of the aft section to be the lowest. Nothing's guaranteed, of course...

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...