Jump to content

New Airline emerging - Amazon Prime Air!


Recommended Posts

I’d say a 10mile radius in optimal conditions is a fair estimate for quad copter operation range, (with warehouse being in the center)

Let’s not rule out a significant longer range with VTOL type drones with efficient forward flight can reach very high speeds (well over 100mph) and range that’s in the 40mile+

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Wonder what a fenced in Rottweiler would make of one dropping in.

Headline: 7-Eleven Just Used a Drone to Deliver a Chicken Sandwich and Slurpees   http://fortune.com/2016/07/22/7-eleven-drone-flirtey-slurpee/ "A 7-Eleven customer’s order for Slurpee

But other industries will cash in on this big time...Hollywood for one.  This will spawn an entire new film industry with titles like: The Drones - a remake of the Hitchcock classic; Rogue Drone.

I bet landing will be tricky. The drones are autonomous. Guided by GPS. So what happens if there's an unexpected obstruction. I would be astonished if they were sophisticated enough to recognise and avoid, for example, a car parked on a drive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I read somewhere, or maybe saw on a video, that the drones would drop the product in a small basket from a wire so they don't actually have to land. which might lead to someone capturing a drone with something like a tent stake. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what happens if there's an unexpected obstruction.

Sonar happens well before the obstruction is meet

So basically you are saying the drones will be bats.

I say we should simply train bats. Flying foxes are the worlds largest bats, I reckon those guys would be strong enough to carry a small package.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

So what happens if there's an unexpected obstruction.

Sonar happens well before the obstruction is meet

 

So basically you are saying the drones will be bats.

I say we should simply train bats. Flying foxes are the worlds largest bats, I reckon those guys would be strong enough to carry a small package.

 

 

Great idea, they already carry the henipavirus and lyssavirus, including rabies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you recognised that as humour, I'm never quite sure.

Our trained bats would be bred in captivity and inoculated against all known diseases.

We could also utilise nanotechnology, nicked from alien spacecraft stored at Area 51. Inject them with a few million nanobots and they should be good to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So what happens if there's an unexpected obstruction.

Sonar happens well before the obstruction is meet

 

The link below is interesting. a recent patent sheds some light on how Prime Air will work.

 

 

According to the patent, the drones will find their destination by continuously tracking the location of the purchaser’s smartphone While this might seem strange at first glance, this implementation enables delivery to customers who might not be at home. The patent, for instance, references how a package might even be delivered to a boat.

 

 

amazon-prime-air-boat.png?w=624

 

 

 

Furthermore, in a hypothetical world filled with Amazon drones flying to and fro, the drones will be able to communicate with each other regarding weather conditions and other pertinent data which could affect deliveries.

 

 

  • Amazon will employ a variety of unmanned vehicles depending on the shape and weight of the product
  • Flight sensors, radar, sonar, cameras and infrared sensors will be employed to ensure safe landing zones are found
  • The unmanned vehicle would constantly monitor its path for humans or other animals and modify navigation to avoid such obstacles

 

 

http://bgr.com/2015/05/08/amazon-prime-air-patent-drone-delivery/

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

I'm with Joe on this one. Theyd be perfect as target practice

When a handful of drones can cause major problems for commercial and private aviation, as the have done several times recently, I can only imagine what hundreds of these could do when buzzing over just one town.

Unfortunately its unlikely that drones would ever be regulated and even if they were it would be near on impossible to enforce..

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30369701

I'll stick with my friendly mail man..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issue the other day. A drone was confiscated, flying over Wimbledon. This was as a result of the increased security in the UK after the recent terrorist activity in Tunisia.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/27/police-tighten-wimbledon-security-after-terrorist-attacks

 


Police have seized a drone hovering over Wimbledon’s famous tennis courts as security measures at high-profile tourist attractions throughout the UK are tightened after the attacks in Tunisia, France and Kuwait.

As Scotland Yard’s most senior counter-terrorism official announced police were looking to increase the security of key sites, businesses and public places across the UK, officers were investigating why the drone, operated by a man from a nearby golf course, was directed above the site of the country’s showcase tennis tournament, which starts on Monday.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

drones will be the worst thing ever happened to humanity in the long run!

what email did for communication; drone will do to our privacy and freedom through it,

i had the scariest thought the other day; people already turned video games to a job; where they play GTO in real life!

one sits in his room in front of a screen and gets paid for it; while on the other side of the world a unaware and under founded people pay the price today;

it is almost like a social experiment phase atm

Link to post
Share on other sites

We shouldn't get too carried away chaps and lasses.  All new technologies have teething problems, not just in terms of technical issues, but frequently in terms of society having to adapt to the technology.

 

May be a few issues at first, until society adapts. One things for sure, you can't disinvent a technology. Drones are hear to stay.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see opportunity for steel umbrella manufacturers...and hard hats.

because the solution to the pollution problem in the San Francisco Bay Area is "don't eat fish", I assume the solution to drones falling on people's head will be "wear something on your head."

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how long before after-market, local area jammers will be available?

 

I'm sure they are semi-autonomous, i.e. aren't really "driven" by the operator every second, but probably still require a link to "home" from time to time.

 

I wonder if it's against the law to use the green lasers on them? Even in daylight that should spoil the video.

 

Do they use ultrasound for ground and obstacle proximity sensing?

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

jammers already are in play

for spying purposes i don’t think a laser will do anything to the video stream; unless it’s a professional photography,

yes they do use ultrasound for obstacle and proximity sensing mainly utilized in indoor flying

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/06/29/california-man-must-pay-for-gunning-down-his-neighbor-drone/

 

A pity... but it's California, of course. The court ruled the drone was not over his property.

 

As for not being video equipped, there's no way to tell from the ground, so it's a reasonable assumption that any drone might be capable of video.

 

I think the rule should be that any drone is fair game if over your property without permission and within shotgun range. I think shotgun range is a reasonable altitude restriction and a good empirical test of whether the offending device was or was not too low. If it was shot down or damaged by a property owner using a shotgun, it was, by definition, too low.

 

Some people get pretty hot and bothered by the idea of the police or government using them. I don't have any problems with police or other government agencies using drones from a height above shotgun range - after all, they use helicopters and nobody seems to care about that. I do have a problem with anyone hovering one at window level or at low altitude over other people's property.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

shotgun alt is too high for drone to fly; your pushing them close to real air traffic alt,

police will be using them in the near future; in the far future i see police work minimized significantly;

with advance drones capable of long range  operation from headquarters; no more in person surveillance,

drones can scan the streets and issue anything from parking tickets to speeding tickets or any mail able violation with fines involved; autonomous meter readers for parking, water, and power services,

thermal and infra-red cameras can be mounted as well; the potential applications for law informants are endless

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
shotgun alt is too high for drone to fly; your pushing them close to real air traffic alt,

 

 

Effective range of a 12 ga. shotgun (largest size in widespread, common use) is generally considered to be 20 to 40 yards, depending on the choke of the barrel.  That is with lead shot, which is now illegal in most (all?) of the US.  Steel shot will probably have an even lower effective range.  I don't think 120' is an unreasonable minimum for a personal drone over someone else's property.

 

John

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...