Jump to content

Comet landing tomorrow!


Recommended Posts

If I recall, it was Delhi rather than Dubai

hifly said...

I heard that the mission was the equivalent of throwing a hammer from London and hitting a nail on the head in Dubai.

When is the next opportunity for the lander to wake up and transmit, or does anyone know?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ah the joys and sorrows of time delay near zero G drone flying. That they hit the target after 10 years of chasing the landing field with frozen hibernating robots is pretty incredible in and of itsel

Well said Matt.    If I may be so bold....  

excuse my skepticism but just what incredible increase in man's knowledge is the billions spent on this escapade going supply? is it going to cure the worlds pollution? perhaps supply water to those w

When is the next opportunity for the lander to wake up and transmit, or does anyone know?

 

They have one solar generator that is illuminated every cometary day, not for long, but it's something so there is hope. As it gest closer to the sun, who knows. The comet will undergo significant changes so anything is possible. It could be wrecked, blown off the surface, spring into life if it catches the sun for long enough, anything I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too bad they opted for solar power instead of nuclear, which is more typical for deep-space probes. If they had, Philae might still be merrily working away and sending data instead of being comatose in the shadow of a rock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that Philae is about the size of a domestic washing machine. I suppose Comet is a good place to go for white goods.

 

To our friends abroad, Comet is a retailer selling domestic appliances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too bad they opted for solar power instead of nuclear, which is more typical for deep-space probes. If they had, Philae might still be merrily working away and sending data instead of being comatose in the shadow of a rock.

 

 

The thought had crossed my mind. Why not a  radioisotope thermoelectric generator?

 

Perhaps a solar generator was chosen in order to reduce weight. Given that the lander is only the size of a small fridge, and packed full of scientific instruments, maybe an RTG would have been too heavy and taken up to much space in a compact lander?

 

I'm speculating of course, I have no idea how big or heavy an RTG is.

 

 

Interestingly, when the lander employed is hammer, [basically a hammer with a temp probe] the surface was harder than they thought, in fact the hammer broke. Looks like the ice beneath the top layer of dust is harder than expected. There is already evidence that the core is beginning to melt, evidence has been detected in orbit.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Interestingly, when the lander employed is hammer, [basically a hammer with a temp probe] the surface was harder than they thought, in fact the hammer broke.

 

How do they use a hammer in such a low-gravity environment?  I would think striking the surface with a hammer would lift the lander right off.  There must way of producing an opposing force but can't think off the top of my head what it would be.  Those guys are a lot smarter than me, so probably have figured it out.  Briefly fire a thruster upward while doing the hammer strike, perhaps?

 

Anyone have any opinions on the #shirtstorm issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John, from what I can tell the hammer was extended on an arm 1m from the lander so it wasn't directly below it or anything.  The arm was designed as a 'C' cross section to allow the hammer to operate in a low gravity environment.  The recoil from the hammer was absorbed by way of a spring system resulting in a very small opposing force.  The hammer was basically a metal probe with a heating element and sensors etc housed in a carbon tube with a small step motor attached.  

 

As for shirt storm, I guess the general media had to find an angle on the story without all that science stuff getting in the way.  The shirt was a birthday gift from a female friend. Maybe not appropriate attire for work, but these crazy scientists.  ;)  I watched his public apology and felt very sorry for the guy.

 

M. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone have any opinions on the #shirtstorm issue?

 

Yes, I do have an opinion on it... I was enraged!

What the poor guy experienced was extreme internet bullying. Okay, he wore a shirt with scantly clad ladies on it, nothing extreme... big deal. He's a heterosexual male, so what. The shirt was even designed by a "female" friend, but that didn't stop the feminists sorry pseudo feminists, extremists actually, ripping the guy to pieces on social media.

 

They bullied the guy to such an extent that he broke down in tears on TV. They deserve locking up in my opinion.

 

These extremists - there's nothing wrong with "true" feminism - campaign for the right to don whatever outfits they choose, I recall images of topless feminists holding placards over their naked breasts, demanding the right. So ironic really, that the same right isn't granted the scientist in question.

 

Kim Kardashian can shove out her huge bum in a photo shoot recently, and pose totally naked, naughty bits on show, and they don't bat an eyelid.

 

The worst thing about it though, is that this guy was in the midst of experiencing the proudest moment of his life, something he had worked hard to achieve for many years. Probably the pinnacle of his career. And these wicked individuals have compromised that for him... over a shirt.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

More and more journalists mutter that awful sentence....."now, what are they saying on social media"  Yikes!!!  They know the majority of them are nasty little trolls giving them the perfect excuse to alter the narrative of a story and aim it directly at the Daily Mail readers of the world. :)

 

I noticed genuine feminists where as upset with the trivialisation of the shirt story as the scientist guy was.

 

Btw I watched the Sky at Night and it was fantastic, thanks for the reminder.  I noticed he wore his shirt for that.

 

M.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw the shirt on Sky at Night too Mark. Awesome shirt I thought. I want one.

There were even death threats directed at the poor guy I believe.

Unfortunately when he looks back at this experience he will remember the death threats too

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's this "shirtstorm" lark? What's that all about? :huh:

 

Some ESA guy on TV was wearing a shirt with a semi naked woman on it. It's a silly tail that everyone's getting hot under the collar about, I'm sure it was an off-the-cuff thing, best sleeve it at that. Sorry I can't give you any links. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

New data in.

It seems the comet is composed of very hard ice, with a thin layer of dust. It has been suggested that it was probably a good thing that it landed under a cliff where the dust is thiner. Elsewhere the lander may have sunk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More fom here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/philae-finds-hard-ice-and-organic-molecules

The team of the SESAME experiment (Surface Electrical, Seismic and Acoustic Monitoring Experiment) can confirm that Churyumov-Gerasimenko is not nearly as soft and fluffy as it was believed to be.

"The strength of the ice found under a layer of dust on the first landing site is surprisingly high,"

Ah, so it's not a 'dirty snowball', it's a Frozen 'dirty snowball'!!

I await more exciting news with bated breath...

Cheers - Dai. :old-git:

Link to post
Share on other sites

More news.


Comet landing: UK team's data bonanza from Philae


Scientists say they detected what might be complex carbon compounds on the surface of the comet the craft landed on two weeks ago.

The results are from the Ptolemy instrument, which is a miniaturised on-board laboratory.

The detection of carbon supports a view that comets may have brought key chemicals to Earth to kick-start life.



Now we have some data and it's: Wow! This is what scientists do this stuff for”

Prof Ian Wright

Open University

The team leader, Prof Ian Wright, told BBC News: "We can say with absolute certainty that we saw a very large signal of what are basically organic (carbon) compounds.

"There is a rich signal there. It is not simple. It is not like there are two compounds; there are clearly a lot of things there - a lot of peaks. Sometimes a complicated compound can give a lot of peaks."

The "peaks" refer to the graph produced by the Ptolemy instrument of the different molecules it detected. The result is in line with initial observations made by a similar German-led instrument on Philae.

In an exclusive interview with BBC News, Prof Wright explained that Ptolemy had gathered huge amounts of scientific data. Normally a quiet, understated man, he was marginally better at containing his enthusiasm than his co-worker and wife, Prof Monica Grady, who jumped for and then wept with joy and relief when Philae landed.

Prof Wright told me: "I am as excited now as I was a couple of weeks ago. It's tremendous!"



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30209533

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...