Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Wing struts above the wing have to be big - they're in compression rather than tension and have to be beefy enough to not buckle. Wings struts below the wing are in tension and the load-bearing elemen

But can it lay an egg?   I've seen photos of that one before but don't know what it is or where it's based.  Such poor taste in flying objects is more commonly seen in the hot air balloon ge

What a cock up.

Posted Images

The HR100/210D is a retractable-gear aircraft. The one pictured is a much smaller, (looks like) fixed-gear airplane. I'm suspicious that the one pictured in this thread is a one-off prototype. I'm having the devil's own time tracking down a picture of it on the internet.

 

@Brett - you've picked a winner this time, mate. Stumped the chumps for sure!

 

The shape of the canopy is wrong for the Robin HR100 series - too much "bubble". I'm going to burn a bit more bandwidth looking for this little bird.

 

Edit - could be a derivitive of the HR200/100

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company that sells the kits and parts to their selection of homebuilt aircraft is still in existence today. An American company also manufactures a completed plane for purchase that is based on the plans from this same company. 

 

Let me know how long to keep this one going. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I kinda like this little plane, even it's a homebuilt. It is the Zenair Tri-Z CH 300

 

I figured it was a pretty popular kit company and decently well known. Can't believe it stumped everyone. :huh:  

Go figure, been trying to stump you guys for awhile now and it was just a 'fill in pic' to pass the time until whoever was next posted a picture, that's why I posted the image of the whole aircraft. :D  I think it was supposed to be March up next but he was in the wind for a bit. 

 

Anyone that has a plane they want to post can have at it next, if March is still traveling.  :)  

 

btw- The aircraft mentioned in the hint about an American company manufacturing the finished complete aircraft from one of their kit plans was the AMD Alarus CH 2000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks John, that's a big compliment considering the combined knowledge of all you aircraft aficionado's. :) I have already learned to not post any WWII planes unless their a one off and even then........... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brett,

 

Had us all stumped, big time!

 

Of course, now that the cat is out of the bag, I knew it looked familiar. Darn! The company is from Ontario, Canada. My old stamping grounds.

 

You all want me to post one? Give this one a try: (sorry about the size)

 

i-vDSsK9V-Th.jpg

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a Bachem Ba 349 Natter, a cousin of the Me-163 Komet in that it is a rocket powered interceptor designed for a thrill-ride to altitude, a pass or two at the bombers and then, in the case of this one, a descent by parachute (pilot and airplane, under separate parachutes). It differed from the Me-163 in one important respect - it was designed for vertical launching. What a ride, as long as the T-Stoff and C-Stoff didn't decide to go super-critical outside the combustion chamber.

 

I've seen one in real-life, at Fantasy of Flight (Wiki says that one is a "static reproduction"). In honesty, though I remembered "Natter" I had to look up the Bachem Ba 349 part.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a Bachem Ba 349 Natter, ... What a ride, as long as the T-Stoff and C-Stoff didn't decide to go super-critical outside the combustion chamber.

 

 

Personally I wouldn't fancy it. It was made of nailed and glued wood, and powered with a rocket. - Massive thrust (for those days) and soap box cart fuselage No no no no......   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well.

 

That didn't last long. Over to you JA.

 

Now can anyone ID the car? This photo must have been taken in the USA. Looks like a Mossie in the background and the Natter is parked under the wing of a four-engined a/c. Possibly taken stateside after war material was delivered after the war??? 1948 Chevvy??

 

i-TJfc3Tz.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice challenge Brett, Never heard of that Zennair. The Natter though, that had an interesting pilot recovery system, the whole aircraft would split in half with the cockpit and propulsion system recovering to earth by parachute. The thing was terrifying to say the least!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's actually a Me-410 in the background March. Looks to be taken at Freeman Field, which some people are digging for the buried aircraft, and coming up with some great finds. http://freemanfieldrecoveryteam.com/ and there's a Facebook page with lots more photos

Thanks Kieren, that's an interesting site. Almost makes me want to join facebook - but that ain't going to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You got it, Chuck - actually built by Blackburn, who came to be owned by H-S.  Nice work.  I thought that front shot was going to give it away.  The part I pixelated on the belly view was a Union Jack.  Your turn.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hawker Siddeley Buccaneer S2 by the looks of it - increased intake area and later colours

 

Oh and March, you can look at the photos while not a member of Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Freeman-Field-Recovery-Team/100776559984890?sk=photos_stream

Thanks Kieren, great site, sad end to some wonderful aircraft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another site that is apparently being dug up is the end of the runway at St Athan where a lot of redundant Spitfires were buried. My father in law was one of those who had to help bury them so he knows where they are!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...